Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science

The justification for the efficiency of manufacturing hollow timber beams from low-grade Scots pine timber

Yurii Lakyda, Artem Kharchuk*

gunevich3@gmail.com

Download article
Abstract

The relevance of this study stems from the need for the rational use of forest resources and the construction industry’s transition to the principles of the circular economy. Small-diameter Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) timber, which is often regarded as waste or firewood, has significant potential for the creation of high-load structural elements. The aim of this study was to provide a mechanical and technological justification for the use of natural, debarked surfaces to form the internal cavity of the timber and to determine the optimal type of adhesive. To achieve this aim, methods of experimental mechanics were employed: specimens were subjected to four-point static bending in accordance with the requirements of the DSTU EN 408:2007 standard. The influence of polyvinyl acetate (PVA) dispersion and polyurethane (PUR) adhesive on the strength of built-up beams was evaluated. The principal findings demonstrate that a cross-section incorporating a star-shaped cavity reduces the weight of the product by 14% while decreasing the section modulus by only 0.77%. Experimental results confirmed that the application of a PVA adhesive eliminates stress concentrations at the sharp corners of the cavity formed by the debarked surfaces of the laminations. This resulted in an 85.8% increase in ultimate bending strength compared with a solid timber beam. It was established that the failure of such specimens was exclusively cohesive within the wood substrate, indicating the high reliability of the reinforcing polymer framework. In contrast, the use of an elastic PUR adhesive proved ineffective owing to the initiation of adhesive delamination, with a strength increase of only 2.0%. Fractographic analysis showed that the microporous structure of PUR cannot withstand peak stresses. The developed resource-efficient technology for manufacturing hollow timber beams makes it possible to produce an element whose structural performance (specific strength) exceeds that of solid timber by 116%. The implementation of such innovative approaches minimises energy consumption during machining and contributes to long-term carbon sequestration in building structures

Keywords

hollow timber beam; small-diameter timber; polyvinyl acetate dispersion; static bending; circular economy; debarked surface

Suggested citation
Lakyda, Yu., & Kharchuk, A. (2026). The justification for the efficiency of manufacturing hollow timber beams from low-grade Scots pine timber. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 17(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.31548/forest/1.2026.57
References
  1. Abad, F., Rameezdeen, R., & Chileshe, N. (2024). Circular economy design strategies in mass timber construction: A systematic literature review. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. doi: 10.1108/SASBE-05-2024-0183.
  2. Balasbaneh, A.T., & Sher, W.A. (2026). Systematic literature review of life cycle sustainability assessment of mass timber in the construction industry toward circular economy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 28, 14073-14109. doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-05377-9.
  3. DSTU EN 408:2007 “Structural timber. Structural and glued laminated timber. Determination of certain physical and mechanical properties”. (2007). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=66659.
  4. European Green Deal. (2019, December). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN.
  5. European Panel Federation. (2024). Annual report. Brussels: European Panel Federation.
  6. Faircloth, A., Gilbert, B.P., Kumar, C., Leggate, W., & McGavin, R.L. (2024). Understanding the adhesion performance of glued laminated timber manufactured with Australian softwood and high-density hardwood species. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 82(6), 2013-2028. doi: 10.1007/s00107-024-02138-3.
  7. Frihart, C.R. (2005). Wood adhesion and adhesives. In R.M. Rowell (Ed.), Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites (pp. 215-278). Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781420004926.
  8. Ghobadi, M., & Sepasgozar, S.M.E. (2023). Circular economy strategies in modern timber construction as a potential response to climate change. Journal of Building Engineering, 77, article number 107229. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107229.
  9. Hass, P., Wittel, F.K., & Niemz, P. (2013). Generic failure mechanisms in adhesive bonds. Holzforschung, 67. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1509.03437.
  10. Iždinský, J., Reinprecht, L., Sedliačik, J., Kúdela, J., & Kučerová, V. (2021). Bonding of selected hardwoods with PVAc adhesive. Applied Sciences, 11(1), article number 67. doi: 10.3390/app11010067.
  11. Kamke, F.A., & Lee, J.N. (2007). Adhesive penetration in wood a review. Wood and Fiber Science, 39(2), 205-220.
  12. Kläusler, O., Clauß, S., Lübke, L., Trachsel, J., & Niemz, P. (2013). Influence of moisture on stress-strain behaviour of adhesives used for structural bonding of wood. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 44, 57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.015.
  13. McGavin, R.L., & Leggate, W. (2019). Comparison of processing methods for small-diameter logs: Sawing versus rotary peeling. BioResources, 14(1), 1545-1563. doi: 10.15376/biores.14.1.1545-1563.
  14. Niemz, P., & Sonderegger, W. (2017). Physics of wood and wood-based materials. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag. doi: 10.3139/9783446445468.
  15. Perković, N., & Rajčić, V. (2022). Mechanical and fire performance of innovative hollow glue-laminated timber beams. Polymers, 14(16), article number 3381. doi: 10.3390/polym14163381.
  16. Perković, N., Barbalić, J., Rajčić, V., & Duvnjak, I. (2022). Compressive strength properties perpendicular to the grain of hollow glue-laminated timber elements. Polymers, 14(16), article number 3403. doi: 10.3390/polym14163403.
  17. Schubert, M., & Kläusler, O. (2020). Applying machine learning to predict the tensile shear strength of bonded beech wood as a function of the composition of polyurethane prepolymers and various pretreatments. Wood Science and Technology, 54, 19-29. doi: 10.1007/s00226-019-01144-6.
  18. Shang, P., Sun, Y., Zhou, D., Qin, K., & Yang, X. (2018). Experimental study of the bending performance of hollow glulam beams. Wood and Fiber Science, 50(1), 3-19. doi: 10.22382/WFS-2018-002.
  19. Tran, A., Konnerth, J., & Gindl-Altmutter, W. (2024). Adhesive strength and micromechanics of wood bonded at different moisture contents. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 132, article number 103688. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103688.
  20. UNECE/FAO. (2023). Circularity concepts in wood construction (ECE/TIM/DP/95). Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and Food and Agriculture Organization.
  21. Xu, C., Cao, Y., Chen, H., & Nie, Y. (2022). Large-scale and high-resolution visualization of static mechanical properties of wood-adhesive interphase utilizing nanoindentation mapping. Wood Science and Technology, 56, 1029-1045. doi: 10.1007/s00226-022-01394-x.