Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science

Phenological growth stages of sorboid group within Malinae (Rosaceae) according to the BBCH scale

Volodymyr Mezhenskyj, Liudmyla Mezhenska, Yuriy Marchuk, Borys Mazur, Oleksandr Havryliuk, Serhii Kovalchuk
Download article
Abstract

The development of a unified system for monitoring the developmental stages of sorboid plants within the subtribe Malinae holds significant economic and ecological importance. The study aimed to develop a comprehensive phenological system for sorboid plants based on the extended BBCH scale. The research was conducted during 2024-2025 at the collection sites of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine and covered 49 species-level taxa representing the genera Aria, Aronia, Cormus, Hedlundia, Micromeles, and Sorbus, as well as the nothogenera ×Amelasorbus, ×Arsorbus, ×Pyraria, ×Sorbaronia, ×Sorbocotoneaster, and ×Sorbopyrus. The methodology involved regular field observations of individual plants, with developmental stages documented through systematic in situ photography throughout the growing season. The development of the extended scale was based on the principles of the decimal BBCH coding system and incorporated refined morphological descriptors for both vegetative and reproductive organs. To account for secondary and tertiary growth cycles observed under recent climatic shifts, a dual-indexing system was implemented to document successive proleptic shoots. The proposed scale consists of eight principal growth stages, substantially adapted to reflect the specific biological traits of sorboid plants. Key modifications include improved descriptors for bud and inflorescence emergence, a numerical system for recording multiple growth flushes (stages 31-39), and a redefinition of late-season stages to emphasise structural and physiological markers, such as leaf fall and winter dormancy, rather than transient optical traits. This standardised coding system provides high precision for bioclimatic monitoring, winter hardiness assessment, and the international exchange of scientific data on sorboid genetic resources. The results of the study can be applied in practice for monitoring the development of sorboid plants in forestry, horticulture, and biodiversity conservation

Keywords

Aria, Aronia, Cormus, Hedlundia, Micromeles, Sorbus, intergeneric hybrids, nothotaxa, phenology

Suggested citation
Mezhenskyj, V., Mezhenska, L., Marchuk, Yu., Mazur, B., Havryliuk, O., & Kovalchuk, S. (2025). Phenological growth stages of sorboid group within Malinae (Rosaceae) according to the BBCH scale. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 16(4), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.31548/forest/4.2025.89
References
  1. Atay, E. (2013). Phenological stages of medlar (Mespilus germanica L. ‘İstanbul’) according to the BBCH scale. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences, 7(20), 103-107.
  2. Campbell, C.S., Evans, R.C., Morgan, D.R., Dickinson, T.A., & Arsenault, M.P. (2007). Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): Limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history. Plant Systematic and Evolution, 266(1),119-145. doi: 10.1007/s00606-007-0545-y.
  3. Fay, M.F., & Rich, T.C.G. (2022a). Rowans, whitebeams and service trees. Curtis’s Botanical Magazine, 39(4), 621-630. doi: 10.1111/curt.12485.
  4. Fay, M.F., & Rich, T.C.G. (2022b). 1042. Sorbus aria: Rosaceae. Curtis’s Botanical Magazine, 39(4), 655-668. doi: 10.1111/curt.12476.
  5. Fedoronchuk, M.M. (2022). Ukrainian flora checklist. 4: Family Rosaceae (Rosales, Angiosperms). Chornomorski Botanical Journal, 18(4), 305-349. doi: 10.32999/ksu1990-553X/2022-18-4-1.
  6. Feng, Z.-H., Huang, Z.-J., Lui, B., & Liu, S. (2024). Nomenclatural novelties for intergeneric nothotaxa. Phytoneuron, 85, 1-41.
  7. Hu, J., Tan, B., Chen, X., Dong, M., & Ma, J. (2025). Molecular phylogenetics of Micromeles (Rosaceae: Maleae): Implications for taxonomy. BMC Plant Biology, 25, article number 1146. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-07143-z.
  8. Ma, J.-H., Chen, X., Hou, W.-X., Geng, L.-Y., & Tang, C.-Q. (2023). Plastome phylogenomics of Micromeles (Rosaceae). Phytotaxa, 589(2), 179-190. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.589.2.5.
  9. Martínez, R., Legua, P., Martínez-Nicolás, J.J., & Melgarejo, P. (2019). Phenological growth stages of “Pero de Cehegín” (Malus domestica Borkh): Codification and description according to the BBCH scale. Scientia Horticulturae, 246, 826-834. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.067.
  10. Martinez-Calvo, J., Badenes, M.L., Llácercer, G., Bleiholder, H., Hack, H., & Meier, U. (1999). Phenological growth stages of loquat tree (Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.). Annals of Applied Biology, 134(3), 353-357. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1999.tb05276.x.
  11. Martínez-Valero, R., Melgarejo, P., Salazar, D.M., Martínez, R., Martínez, J.J., & Hernández, F.C.A. (2001). Phenological stages of the quince tree (Cydonia oblonga). Annals of Applied Biology, 139(2), 189-192. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00395.x.
  12. Meier, U., et al. (1994). The phenological development stages of pome fruits (Malus domestica Borkh. and Pyrus communis L.), stone fruits (Prunus species), currants (Ribes species), and strawberries (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes, 46, 141-153.
  13. Meier, U. (Ed.). (2001). Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants. BBCH Monograph. Quedlinburg: Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry.
  14. Mezhenska, L.O., Mezhenskyj, V.M., & Yakubenko, B.Ye. (2018). NULESU collection of fruit and ornamental plants. Kyiv: Lira-K.
  15. Mezhenskyj, V.M. (2019). Collecting sorboid plants for their horticultural merit and use in breeding work in Ukraine. Acta Horticulturae, 1259, 25-30. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1259.5.
  16. Mosyakin, S.L., Fedoronchuk, M.M., & McNeil, J. (2022). (2886) Proposal to conserve the name Aria against Chamaemespilus and Torminalis (Rosaceae). Taxon, 71(2), 480-481. doi: 10.1002/tax.12705.
  17. Mosyakin, S.L., Fedoronchuk, M.M., & McNeill, J. (2025). Simplifying the nomenclature of Sorbus sensu lato: New nomenclatural solutions in Aria and Hedlundia (Rosaceae). Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 82(3), 206-224. doi: 10.15407/ukrbotj82.03.206.
  18. Papagiannopoulou, D., & Tsitsoni, T. (2022). The phenological stages of forestry species under the impact of climate change. Early data. Annals of Environmental Science and Toxicology, 6(1), 069-073.doi: 10.17352/aest.000057
  19. Raspé, O., Findlay, C., & Jacquemart, A.-L. (2000). Sorbus aucuparia L. Journal of Ecology, 88, 910-930. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00502.x.
  20. Rushforth, K. (2018). The Whitebeam problem, and a solution. Phytologia, 100(4), 222-247.
  21. Rushforth, K. (2019). Apples, whitebeams and their cousins. Curtis’s Botanical Magazine, 36(4), 335-339. doi: 10.1111/curt.12301.
  22. Sennikov, A.N., & Kurtto, A. (2017). A phylogenetic checklist of Sorbus s. l. (Rosaceae) in Europe. Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, 93, 1-78.
  23. Sun, J.H., Shi, S., Li, J.L., Yu, J., Wang, L., Yang, X.Y., Guo, L., & Zhou, S.L. (2018). Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) based on multiple chloroplast regions: Implications to gene circumscription. BioMed Research International, 2018, article number 7627191. doi: 10.1155/2018/7627191.
  24. Wilson, K.L. (2024). Report of the General Committee: 31. Taxon, 73(4), 1081-1084. doi: 10.1002/tax.13224.