Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science

Representatives of the genus Chamaecyparis Spach in the collections of botanical gardens in Kyiv

Serhii Kovalevskii, Vitalii Lodok
Download article
Abstract

Despite their limited use in Kyiv’s landscaping due to a perceived sensitivity, representatives of the genus Chamaecyparis Spach are actively represented in the city’s botanical collections and are valued for the diversity of cultivars with ornamental traits. The purpose of the scientific research was to assess the existing diversity of species and cultivars in the collections of botanical institutions in Kyiv. The collection fund of Chamaecyparis Spach representatives in the botanical gardens of Kyiv was analysed: the National Botanical Garden of M.M. Gryshko National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, the Botanical Garden of the National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, and the Botanical Garden of the National University of Life and Environmental sciences of Ukraine. It was determined that the largest collection is held at the National Botanical Garden of M.M. Gryshko, where Chamaecyparis pisifera (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl. is represented by 8 cultivars, Chamaecyparis obtusa (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl. by 5 cultivars, and Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (A. Murray bis) Parl. by 11 cultivars. In total, 37 cultivars were found in the botanical collections of Kyiv, with the highest number of taxa recorded in Chamaecyparis lawsoniana – 18 cultivars, the smallest in Chamaecyparis obtusa – 16 cultivars, and Chamaecyparis pisifera represented by 13 cultivars. A brief description of the species and cultivars presented in the collections is provided, the current state of the collection plantings is described, and the prospects for the addition of new taxa to the collections are discussed. It was established that collection plantings provide a basis for analysing the adaptation level of cultivars to local climatic conditions and represent specimens of various ages along with their physiological states, depending on age, origin, and maintenance practices. The diversity of plants in the collections, particularly those over 50 years old, demonstrates the sufficient resilience of most cultivars and species to adverse environmental factors and supports their broader use in urban landscaping. The research findings can be utilised to expand the assortment of ornamental coniferous plants in urban greening by introducing promising Chamaecyparis Spach cultivars adapted to the conditions of Kyiv

Keywords

species, cultivar, assortment, coniferous plants, coniferetum, dendrarium

Suggested citation
Kovalevskii, S., & Lodok, V. (2025). Representatives of the genus Chamaecyparis Spach in the collections of botanical gardens in Kyiv. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 16(3), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.31548/forest/3.2025.40
References
  1. Boiko, N.S. (Ed.). (2023). Maintaining collections of gymnosperms in Ukraine: Achievements, challenges, and prospects. Bila Tserkva: Bilotserkivdruk.
  2. Boniuk, Z.H., & Palagechi, R.M. (Eds.). (2023). Collection of woody plants of O.V. Fomin Botanical Garden: Guidebook-reference. Kyiv: Talkom.
  3. Brischke, C., Bollmus, S., Melcher, E., & Stephan, I. (2023). Biological durability and moisture dynamics of Dawn redwood (Metasequoia glyptostroboides) and Port Orford cedar (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana). Wood Material Science & Engineering, 18(3), 1024-1034. doi: 10.1080/17480272.2022.2101941.
  4. Cedro, A., Nowak, G., & Kowalewska-Kalkowska, H. (2021). Climate response in tree-rings of Sawara cypress [Chamaecyparis pisifera (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl.] in Poland. Forests, 12(8), article number 967. doi: 10.3390/f12080967.
  5. Fiordi, A.C., & Maugini, E. (1977). On the megasporogenesis in Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Parl. Caryologia, 30(1), 77-96. doi: 10.1080/00087114.1977.10796683.
  6. Górski, K.M., Kowalczyk, T., Picot, L., Rijo, P., Ghorbanpour, M., & Sitarek, P. (2024). The precious potential of the sacred tree Chamaecyparis obtusa (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl. as a source of secondary metabolites with broad biological applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(5), article number 2723. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052723.
  7. Hart, J.A., & Price, R.A. (1990). Genera of Cupressaceae (including Taxodiaceae) in the Southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 71, 275-322.
  8. Hoshino, D., Nishimura, N., & Yamamoto, S. (2001). Age, size structure and spatial pattern of major tree species in an old-growth Chamaecyparis obtusa forest, Central Japan. Forest Ecology and Management, 152(1-3), 31-43. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00614-9.
  9. Kang, D.B., Sung, J.W., & Lee, D.H. (2021). Effects of shading and fertilizer treatments on the growth characteristics of Chamaecyparis obtusa (S. et Z.) Endlicher seedlings. Forest Science and Technology, 17(3), 125-134. doi: 10.1080/21580103.2021.1957722.
  10. Kato-Noguchi, H., Mori, K., Iwasaki, A., & Suenaga, K. (2024). Allelopathy and allelochemicals in Chamaecyparis obtusa leaves for the development of sustainable agriculture. Agronomy, 14(7), article number 1557. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14071557.
  11. Kitzmiller, J.H., & Sniezko, R.A. (2021). Range-wide genetic variation in Port-Orford-cedar (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana [A. Murr.] Parl.): I. Early height growth. In Frontiers of forest biology: Proceedings of the 1998 joint meeting of the North American Forest Biology Workshop and the Western. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  12. Kokhno, N.A. (1987). Catalog of trees and shrubs of botanical gardens of the Ukrainian SSR. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
  13. Kolesnichenko, O.V., Slyusar, S.I., & Yakobchuk, O.M. (2010). Catalog of tree plants of the Botanical Garden of NUBiP Ukraine. Kyiv: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine.
  14. Kuznetsov, S.I. (2015). The phenofund of Pinophyta in Ukraine at the beginning of the 21st century: Changes in taxonomy, composition of collections, directions of introduction. Introduction of Plants, 4, 10-17. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2527180
  15. Kuznetsov, S.I., Kushnir, A.I., Levon, F.M., Pushkar, V.V., Sukhanova, O.A., Kuznetsova, M.S., & Goncharenko, B.V. (2020). Assortment of trees, shrubs, and vines for landscape construction in Ukraine. Kyiv: CP “KOMPRINT”.
  16. Li, C.F., et al. (2015). Chamaecyparis montane cloud forest in Taiwan: Ecology and vegetation classification. Ecological Research, 30(5), 771-791. doi: 10.1007/s11284-015-1284-0.
  17. Morozko, A., & Kolesnichenko, O. (2024). Comprehensive assessment of the decorative value of Araliaceae Juss. woody species in the collection plantations of botanical gardens of Kyiv. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 20(6),105-120. doi: 10.31548/dopovidi/6.2024.105.
  18. Nagao, A., Sasaki, S., & Pharis, R.P. (2019). Chamaecyparis: En. white cedar, false cypress. In Handbook of flowering (pp. 170-188). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  19. Osone, Y., et al. (2020). Plant trait database for Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa (SugiHinoki DB): Their physiology, morphology, anatomy and biochemistry. Ecological Research, 35(1), 274-275. doi: 10.1111/1440-1703.12062.
  20. POWO. (n.d.). Plants of the World Online. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Retrieved from http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/.
  21. Reshetnyak, T.A. (1980). Genus Chamaecyparis (Chamaegyparis Spach.) in connection with its introduction in Ukraine: Systematics, geography, ecological and biological features, and utilization paths. Manuscript, institute archive.
  22. Wang, Y., Ruhsam, M., Milne, R., Graham, S.W., Li, J., Tao, T., Zhang, Y., & Mao, K. (2022). Incomplete lineage sorting and local extinction shaped the complex evolutionary history of the Paleogene relict conifer genus, Chamaecyparis (Cupressaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 172, article number 107485. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107485.
  23. WFO. (2025). World Flora Online. Retrieved from http://www.worldfloraonline.org.
  24. Zaimenko, N.V., Cherevchenko, T.M., Gaponenko, M.B., Rakhmetov, D.B., & Shumik, M.I. (2020). M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of NAS of Ukraine – an important scientific centre for the introduction and conservation of plant diversity in Ukraine. Plant Introduction, 3, 5-13. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2550389.
  25. Zobel, D.B., & Hawk, G.M. (1980). The environment of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana. American Midland Naturalist, 103(1), 280-297.