Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in the context of war: Environmental and economic challenges to Ukrainian national security

Oleh Semenenko, Robert Ovanesian, Uzef Dobrovolskyi, Vasyl Cherep, Viktor Tsarynnyk
Abstract

The study aimed to identify the effects of military operations on forest ecosystems and find effective approaches to their restoration in the face of environmental and economic challenges. The methodology used was to analyse the impact of military operations on forest ecosystems, assess the economic consequences of forest degradation, and develop a restoration strategy through demining, reclamation and the implementation of monitoring systems. The study analysed the extent of destruction of forest ecosystems as a result of the war, including loss of tree cover, damage caused by fires, mining and mechanical damage. The study established that most forest areas have lost their ability to regenerate themselves due to changes in the hydrological regime and biodiversity. The data on soil contamination with heavy metals are summarised: lead 450 mg/kg and cadmium 6.5 mg/kg were detected in Izium forest; lead 390 mg/kg and cadmium 5.2 mg/kg in Sviatohirsk forest; lead 280 mg/kg and cadmium 3.8 mg/kg in Chernihiv forest; lead 320 mg/kg and cadmium 4.1 mg/kg in Kherson forest. The economic losses from the decline in forest resources, reduction in forest industry revenues and job losses were estimated. The impact on agriculture was analysed, including a decrease in soil productivity, erosion and changes in microclimate. Social consequences, including population displacement and increased unemployment, were identified. Threats to national security due to environmental destabilisation were outlined. The necessity of an integrated approach to restoration, including demining, soil treatment, reforestation with adaptive species and satellite monitoring to prevent illegal logging, was substantiated. The findings of this study can be used to develop strategies for restoring forest ecosystems, planning environmental policy, as well as to attract international assistance and implement sustainable forestry practices in Ukraine

Keywords

soil contamination, mining, biodiversity, phytoremediation, state policy

Suggested citation
Semenenko, O., Ovanesian, R., Dobrovolskyi, U., Cherep, V., & Tsarynnyk, V. (2025). Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in the context of war: Environmental and economic challenges to Ukrainian national security. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 16(2), 167-191. https://doi.org/10.31548/forest/2.2025.167
References
  1. Accounting Chamber. (2024). War, fires and illegal logging caused losses to the state of almost UAH 23 billion: Report on the results of the audit of forestry and hunting. Retrieved from https://rp.gov.ua/PressCenter/News/?id=1840.
  2. Adie, H., & Lawes, M.J. (2022). Solutions to fire and shade: Resprouting, growing tall and the origin of Eurasian temperate broadleaved forest. Biological Reviews, 98(2), 643-661. doi: 10.1111/brv.12923.
  3. Barker, A.J., Clausen, J.L., Douglas, T.A., Bednar, A.J., Griggs, C.S., & Martin, W.A. (2020). Environmental impact of metals resulting from military training activities: A review. Chemosphere, 265, article number 129110. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129110.
  4. Bayegizova, A., Abdikerimova, G., Kaliyeva, S., Shaikhanova, A., Shangytbayeva, G., Sugurova, L., Sugur, Z., & Saimanova, Z. (2024). Fire detection using deep learning methods. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 14(1), 547-555. doi: 10.11591/ijece.v14i1.pp547-555.
  5. Can soil be cured of war – answers to the most frequently asked questions. (2023). Retrieved from https://kurkul.com/spetsproekty/1423-chi-mojna-vilikuvati-grunt-vid-viyni--vidpovidi-na-nayposhirenishi-zapitannya.
  6. Castro, J., Morales‐Rueda, F., Navarro, F.B., Löf, M., Vacchiano, G., & Alcaraz‐Segura, D. (2021). Precision restoration: A necessary approach to foster forest recovery in the 21st century. Restoration Ecology, 29(7), article number e13421. doi: 10.1111/rec.13421.
  7. Chazdon, R.L., Wilson, S.J., Brondizio, E., Guariguata, M.R., & Herbohn, J. (2020). Key challenges for governing forest and landscape restoration across different contexts. Land Use Policy, 104, article number 104854. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104854.
  8. Daiyoub, A., Saura-Mas, S., & Maarouf, Y. (2024). The impact of war on forest logging: Changes in logging practices in Syrian rural communities. Trees Forests and People, 18, article number 100668. doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100668.
  9. Fedoniuk, T., Zhuravel, S., Kravchuk, M., Pazych, V., & Bezvershuck, I. (2024). Historical sketch and current state of weed diversity in continental zone of Ukraine. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 58(5), 631-642. doi: 10.34044/j.anres.2024.58.5.10.
  10. Filho, W.L., Fedoruk, M., Eustachio, J.H.P.P., Splodytel, A., Smaliychuk, A., & Szynkowska-Jóźwik, M.I. (2024). The environment as the first victim: The impacts of the war on the preservation areas in Ukraine. Journal of Environmental Management, 364, article number 121399. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121399.
  11. Flamm, P., & Kroll, S. (2024). Environmental (in)security, peacebuilding and green economic recovery in the context of Russia’s war against Ukraine. Environment and Security, 2(1), 21-46. doi: 10.1177/27538796241231332.
  12. Forest of Ukraine. (2023). SE “Forests of Ukraine” together with communities and international partners is launching the FOREST RECOVERY forest rescue program! Retrieved from https://e-forest.gov.ua/dp-lisy-ukrainy-razom-z-hromadamy-ta-mizhnarodnymy-partneramy-zapuskaie-prohramu-poriatunku-lisiv-forest-recovery/.
  13. Global Environment Facility. (2024). The GEF monitoring report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/documents/2024-01/EN_GEF.C.66.03_The_GEF_Monitoring_Report_2023_0.pdf.
  14. Guidi Nissim, W., Castiglione, S., Guarino, F., Pastore, M.C., & Labra, M. (2023). Beyond cleansing: Ecosystem services related to phytoremediation. Plants, 12(5), article number 1031. doi: 10.3390/plants12051031.
  15. Hoang, N.T., & Kanemoto, K. (2021). Mapping the deforestation footprint of nations reveals growing threat to tropical forests. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5, 845-853. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01417-z.
  16. Hua, F., et al. (2022). The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches. Science, 376(6595), 839-844. doi: 10.1126/science.abl4649.
  17. Kolawole, A.S., & Iyiola, A.O. (2023). Environmental pollution: threats, impact on biodiversity, and protection strategies. In S. Chibueze Izah & M. Chidozie Ogwu (Eds.), Sustainable utilization and conservation of Africa’s biological resources and environment (pp. 377-409). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-6974-4_14.
  18. Krajnović, Z., & Smolek, A. (2024). Impact of military activities on the environmentStrategies, 8(2), 89-124.
  19. Krawczyńska, D., Hadasik, B., Ryczko, A., Przedworska, K., & Kubiczek, J. (2024). Pursuing European Green Deal milestones in times of war in Ukraine – a context of energy transition in Poland. Economics and Environment, 88(1), article number 736. doi: 10.34659/eis.2024.88.1.736.
  20. Kumar, S.P., Sathiyamurthi, S., Nalini, S., Sivasakthi, M., Kumar, M.S., Ragavaraj, R., & Prabakaran, J. (2025). Recent advances in phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil: Application and its limitations. In A. Kuanar, A. Prasad Das, D. Kar & M.P. Shah (Eds.), Sustainable management of environmental pollutants through phytoremediation (pp. 57-77). Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781003442295.
  21. Kyiv School of Economics. (2024). Report on direct infrastructure damage from destruction as a result of Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine as of early 2024. Retrieved from https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/01.01.24_Damages_Report.pdf.
  22. Löfqvist, S., et al. (2022). How social considerations improve the equity and effectiveness of ecosystem restoration. BioScience, 73(2), 134-148. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biac099.
  23. Ma, S., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Wang, L., & Jiang, J. (2022). A nature-based solution in forest management to improve ecosystem services and mitigate their trade-offs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 351, article number 131557. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131557.
  24. Mansourian, S., Berrahmouni, N., Blaser, J., Dudley, N., Maginnis, S., Mumba, M., & Vallauri, D. (2021). Reflecting on twenty years of forest landscape restoration. Restoration Ecology, 29(7), article number e13441. doi: 10.1111/rec.13441.
  25. Matkivskyi, M., & Taras, T. (2024). Pollution of the atmosphere, soil and water resources as a result of the Russian-Ukrainian war. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, 15(1), 87-99. doi: 10.69628/esbur/1.2024.87.
  26. Melnykovych, M., et al. (2025). Pathways for Ukraine’s post-war recovery: Forest socio-ecological system in the focus. Preprints, article number 2025021736. doi: 10.20944/preprints202502.1736.v1.
  27. Meng, X., Lu, B., Liu, C., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., Herrmann, H., & Li, X. (2023). Abrupt exacerbation in air quality over Europe after the outbreak of Russia-Ukraine war. Environment International, 178, article number 108120. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108120.
  28. Moroz, V. (2024). International experience and strategies for forest management in the context of growing forest pollution. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 20(6), 33-49. doi: 10.31548/dopovidi/6.2024.33.
  29. Mozghovyi, D., Korchynskyi, V., & Svynarenko, D. (2024). Methodology of satellite monitoring of deforestation based on Sentinel-2A/B dataChallenges and Issues of Modern Science, 3, 133-143.
  30. Munitions and chemicals: How does war harm soils and what are the solutions? (2022). Retrieved from https://rubryka.com/en/article/soil-ukraine/.
  31. Nguyen, T.T., Grote, U., Neubacher, F., Rahut, D.B., Do, M.H., & Paudel, G.P. (2023). Security risks from climate change and environmental degradation: implications for sustainable land use transformation in the Global South. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 63, article number 101322. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101322.
  32. Pandya, M., & Didwania, K. (2021). Existential repercussions of development: Deforestation caused by haphazard urbanisation and rapid industrialisationInternational Journal, 1(3), 1372-1397.
  33. Pereira, P., Bašić, F., Bogunovic, I., & Barcelo, D. (2022). Russian-Ukrainian war impacts the total environment. Science of the Total Environment, 837, article number 155865. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155865.
  34. Petrychenko, V., Petrychenko, O., Fedoryshyna, L., Kravchuk, O., Korniichuk, O., & Nitsenko, V. (2022). Agricultural production in Ukraine: Ecological challenges and impact on the quality of life. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(45), 374-384. doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.4.45.2022.3782.
  35. Priya, A.K., Muruganandam, M., Ali, S.S., & Kornaros, M. (2023). Clean-up of heavy metals from contaminated soil by phytoremediation: A multidisciplinary and eco-friendly approach. Toxics, 11(5), article number 422. doi: 10.3390/toxics11050422.
  36. Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council “On Nature Restoration”. (2024, June). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1991/oj/eng.
  37. Report on the Program for the Development of Tourism and Resorts in the Transcarpathian Region for 2021-2023. (2023). Retrieved from https://zaktour.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/%D0%B7%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82-%D0%BF%D0%BE-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%96-21-23-2.docx.pdf.
  38. Review of the year of war for Ukraine’s water resources. (2023). Retrieved from https://epl.org.ua/announces/oglyad-roku-vijny-dlya-vodnyh-resursiv-ukrayiny/.
  39. Rodriguez-Jimenez, F., Novo, A., & Hall, J.V. (2024). Influence of wildfires on the conflict (2006-2022) in eastern Ukraine using remote sensing techniques (MODIS and Sentinel-2 images). Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment, 35, article number 101240. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101240.
  40. Rybalova, O.V., Kochura, A.S., & Yarmola, V.A. (2023). The impact of hostilities on unique natural sites of Ukraine. In Proceedings of the XIV international scientific and practical conference “Prospects for the development of science and the environment” (pp. 88-94). Helsinki: CPN Publishing Group.
  41. Scheper, A.C., Verweij, P.A., & Van Kuijk, M. (2021). Post-fire forest restoration in the humid tropics: A synthesis of available strategies and knowledge gaps for effective restoration. Science of the Total Environment, 771, article number 144647. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144647.
  42. Soils and war: Research into the impact on plant development, water, and yields. (2024). Retrieved from https://superagronom.com/cards/vpliv-voyennih-diy-na-stan-gruntu-rozvitok-rosli-id29816.
  43. Sonne, C., Lam, S.S., & Kanstrup, N. (2023). The environmental threats from lead ammunition. Eco-Environment & Health, 2(1), 16-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eehl.2023.02.001.
  44. State Agency of Forest Resources of Ukraine. (2024). Public report of the Head of the State Agency of Forest Resources of Ukraine for 2023. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/17-civik-2018/zvit2023/zvit_lis_%202023.pdf.
  45. State Ecological Inspectorate of Ukraine. (2025). Results of state supervision (control) in the field of environmental protection for the first quarter of 2025. Retrieved from https://www.dei.gov.ua/post/3155.
  46. Strokal, V., Berezhniak, Y., Naumovska, O., Vahaliuk, L., Ladyka, M., Pavliuk, S., Palamarchuk, S., & Serbeniuk, H. (2024). Natural resources of Ukraine: Consequences and risks of russian aggression. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 15(1), 37-60. doi: 10.31548/biologiya15(1).2024.004.
  47. Tarnavskyi, A.B., & Rykhva, V.V. (2024). Ecological state of Donetsk region in conditions of military operations. In Collection of abstracts of the v international scientific and practical conference “Environmental safety in war” (pp. 77-78). Lviv: Lviv State University of Life Safety.
  48. Tedesco, A.M., et al. (2022). The role of incentive mechanisms in promoting forest restoration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 378(1867), article number 88. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0088.
  49. The “Million Trees in 24 Hours” project has been launched in Ukraine. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/3096185-v-ukraini-startuvav-proekt-miljon-derev-za-24-godini.html.
  50. Tolochko, S., Bordіug, N., Mironets, L., Alpatova, O., Dovhopola, L., & Mehem, O. (2024). Application of project technologies in the formation of environmental competence of high school students to overcome the environmental consequences of war. In S. Tolochko (Ed.), Transformation of education: Modern challenges (pp. 3-25). Kyiv: Technology Centre PC.
  51. Turunen, J., Elbrecht, V., Steinke, D., & Aroviita, J. (2021). Riparian forests can mitigate warming and ecological degradation of agricultural headwater streams. Freshwater Biology, 66(4), 785-798. doi: 10.1111/fwb.13678.
  52. United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021-2030). (2019, March). Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3794317?ln=ru&v=pdf.
  53. Vasylyuk, O., Kolomytsev, H., & Parkhomenko, V. (2024). Forests in the Fire of War. Over 1,000 Square Kilometers Lost. Retrieved from https://uwecworkgroup.info/uk/flames-of-war-how-ukraine-lost-over-1000-square-kilometers-of-forest/.
  54. Vedmedenko, I. (2024). Multi-billion dollar losses: It became known how many Ukrainian forests were destroyed by the Russians. Retrieved from https://www.unian.ua/ecology/viyna-v-ukrajini-okupanti-povnistyu-znishchili-ponad-60-tis-gektariv-lisiv-12597891.html.
  55. Wenning, R.J., & Tomasi, T.D. (2022). Using US Natural Resource Damage Assessment to understand the environmental consequences of the war in Ukraine. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 19(2), 366-375. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4716.
  56. Xia, L., Wan, L., Wang, W., Luo, J., & Yan, J. (2023). Energy accessibility via natural resources: Do natural resources ensure energy accessibility in low income countries? Resources Policy, 86, article number 104145. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104145.
  57. Xie, M., Irfan, M., Razzaq, A., & Dagar, V. (2022). Forest and mineral volatility and economic performance: Evidence from frequency domain causality approach for global data. Resources Policy, 76, article number 102685. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102685.
  58. Yutilova, K., Shved, E., Rozantsev, G., & Adamski, A. (2025). Russia-Ukraine war impacts on environment: Warfare chemical pollution and recovery prospects. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32(9), 5685-5702. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36098-9.
  59. Zakari, R.Y., Shafik, W., Kalinaki, K., & Iheaturu, C.J. (2024). Internet of forestry things (IoFT) technologies and applications in Forest management. In A. Khang, V. Abdullayev, V. Hahanov & V. Shah (Eds.), Advanced IoT technologies and applications in the Industry 4.0 digital economy (pp. 275-295). Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781003434269.