Evaluation of forest fire severity is a basis of post-fire forest management. Remote sensing-based methods enable reliable delineation of fire perimeters, however, assessments of the degree of forest damage need to be verified and adjusted through field sampling. The forest damage assessment conducted in this study is useful for practitioners to understand and justify the design of clear cuts for restoration purposes. Thus, the aim of the study is to verify the different approaches to field assessment of forest fire severity. In this paper, the authors present a site-specific assessment of large wildfires in Luhansk oblast, Ukraine occurred in 2020 using field-based burn severity indices. The Composite Burn Index (CBI) and the Geometrically Structured Composite Burn Index (GeoCBI) were used to estimate the extent of forest damage. The Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) methodology was also tested to assess the extent of soil damage. The authors used PlanetScope images to delineate perimeters of burned areas. These perimeters were overlaid over a forest inventory database to extract forest attributes and site characteristics for all forested and unforested areas affected by fires. Within the fire perimeters, the burned area was stratified into six strata to independently account for forest damage in diverse types of land cover. In total 73 test plots were proportionally distributed among different classes of land cover to assess fire severity using CBI, GeoCBI, and BAER approaches. It was found that the fire’s footprints covered 39,782 hectares. Among that area, 21.2% were forested lands. About 78% of burned forests were pine plantations. The highest fire intensity levels were estimated within pure pine plantations that were grown in very dry sites, while the lowest ones were associated with hardwoods forests in moisture site conditions. The average estimates of fire severity using the field-based indices varied within strata (CBI>GeoCBI) which could be an issue for assessing burn severity using remote sensing-based approaches. The authors also concluded that the BAER methodology contributed less to assessing the fire intensity because soil burn severity is not directly related to vegetation damage. This work creates a foundation for further assessment of fire severity using satellite imagery. As a result of this study, a spatial data set of sample plots was proposed that can facilitate calibrating approaches used to map fire severity in the region
field-based burn severity indices, forest damage, burned area, site condition
[1] Hall, J.V., Zibtsev, S.V., Giglio, L., Skakun, S., Myroniuk, V., Zhuravel, O., Goldammer, J.G., & Kussul, N. (2021). Environmental and political implications of underestimated cropland burning in Ukraine. Environmental Research Letters, 16, article number 064019. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abfc04.
[2] De Santis, A., & Chuvieco, E. (2009). GeoCBI: A modified version of the Composite Burn index for the initial assessment of the short-term burn severity from remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(3), 554-562. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.011.
[3] Maillé, E., & Espinasse, B. (2012). Modeling changes in WUI to better preview changes in forest fire risk. In Modelling fire behaviour and risk (pp. 231-236). Sassari: University of Sassari.
[4] Boutet, J.C., & Weishampel, J.F. (2003). Spatial pattern analysis of pre- and posthurricane forest canopy structure in North Carolina, USA. Landscape Ecology, 18, 553-559. doi: 10.1023/A:1026058312853.
[5] De Vasconcelos, S.S., Fearnside, P.M. De Alencastro Graça, P.M.L., Nogueira, E.M., De Oliveira, L.C., & Figueiredo, E.O. (2013). Forest fires in Southwestern Brazilian Amazonia: Estimates of area and potential carbon emissions. Forest Ecology and Management, 291, 199-208. doi: 10.1016/J.FORECO.2012.11.044.
[6] Soshenskyi, O., Zibtsev, S., Gumeniuk, V., Goldammer, J.G., Vasylyshyn, R., & Blyshchyk, V. (2021). The current landscape fire management in Ukraine and strategy for its improvement. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 9(2), 39-51. doi: 10.2478/environ-2021-0009.
[7] Zibtsev, S.V., Soshenskyi, O.M., Myroniuk, V.V., & Gumeniuk, V.V. (2020). Wildfire in Ukraine: An overview of fires and fire management system. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 11(2), 15-31. doi: 10.31548/forest2020.02.015.
[8] Evangeliou, N., Zibtsev, S., Myroniuk, V., Zhurba, M., Hamburger, T., Stohl, A., Balkanski, Y., Paugam, R., Mousseau, T.A., Moller, A.P., & Kireev, S.I. (2016). Resuspension and atmospheric transport of radionuclides due to wildfires near the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in 2015. An impact assessment. Scientific Reports, 6, article number 26062. doi: 10.1038/srep26062.
[9] Zibtsev, S.V., Soshenskyi, O.M., Gumeniuk, V.V., & Koren, V.A. (2019). Long-term dynamic of forest fires in Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 10(3), 27-40. doi: 10.31548/forest2019.03.027.
[10] Soshenskyi, O.M., Zibtsev, S.V., Terentiev, A.Yu., & Vorotynskyi, O.G. (2021). Social and environmental consequences of catastrophic forest fires in Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 11(3), 21-34. doi: 10.31548/ forest2021.03.002.
[11] Wildfires in the Eastern European Region: Science, policies and management and inauguration of the regional Eastern European fire monitoring center (REEFMC). (2013). Retrieved from https://gfmc.Online/wp-content/uploads/05- IFFN-43-Ukraine-1.pdf.
[12] Goldammer, J.G. (2021). Thirty years international wildland fire conferences: Review and achievements of a circumglobal journey from Boston to Campo Grande. Biodiversidade Brasileira, 11(2), 6-52. doi: 10.37002/biobrasil.v11i2.1743.
[13] Sydorenko, S., Voron, V., Koval, I., Sydorenko, S., Rumiantsev, M., & Hurzhii, R. (2021). Postfire tree mortality and fire resistance patterns in pine forests of Ukraine. Central European Forestry Journal, 67, 1-9. doi: 10.2478/forj-2020-0029.
[14] Voron, V.P. (Ed.). (2021). Pyrogenic transformation of pines of Ukraine. Kharkiv: Planeta-Print LLC.
[15] Barros, A.M.G., Ager, A.A., Day, M.A., Krawchuk, M.A., & Spies, T.A. (2018). Wildfires managed for restoration enhance ecological resilience. Ecosphere, 9, article number e02161. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2161.
[16] Saulino, L., Rita, A., Migliozzi, A., Maffei, C., Allevato, E., Garonna, A.P., & Saracino, A. (2020). Detecting burn severity across Mediterranean forest types by coupling medium-spatial resolution satellite imagery and field data. Remote Sensing, 12(4), article number 741. doi: 10.3390/rs12040741.
[17] Key, C.H., & Benson, N.C. (2006). Landscape assessment. Washington: Rocky Mountain Research Station.
[18] Franco, M.G., Mundo, I.A., & Veblen, T.T. (2020). Field-validated burn-severity mapping in North Patagonian Forests. Remote Sens,12, article number 214. doi: 10.3390/rs12020214.
[19] Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A., Blake, W.H., Chafer, C.J., Humphreys, G.S., & Wallbrink, P.J. (2006). Effects of differing wildfire severities on soil wettability and implications for hydrological response. Journal of Hydrology, 319, 295-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.038.
[20] Wang, G.G. (2002). Fire severity in relation to canopy composition within burned boreal mixewood stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 163, 85-92. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00529-1.
[21] Parson, A., Robichaud, P.R., Lewis, S.A., Napper, C., & Clark, J.T. (2010). Field guide for mapping post-fire soil burn severity. Washington: Rocky Mountain Research Station. doi: 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-243.
[22] Safford, H.D., Miller, J., Schmidt, D., Roath, B., & Parsons, A. (2008). BAER soil burn severity maps do not measure fireeffects to vegetation: A comment on Odion and Hanson. Ecosystems, 11, 1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10021-007-9094-z.
[23] Whittier, T.R., & Gray, A.N. (2016). Tree mortality based fire severity classification for forest inventories: A pacific Northwest national forests example. Forest Ecology and Management, 359, 199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.015.
[24] Lutes, D.C., Keane, R.E., Caratti, J.F., Key, C.H., Benson, N.C., Sutherland, S., & Gangi, L.J. (2006). FIREMON: Fire effects monitoring and inventory system. Washington: Rocky Mountain Research Station. doi: 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-164.
[25] Stambaugh, M.C., Hammer, L.D, & Godfrey, R. (2015). Performance of burn-severity metrics and clas sification in oak woodlands and grasslands. Rem Sens, 7(8), 10501-10522. doi: 10.3390/rs70810501.
[26] Kasischke, E.S., Turetsky, M.R., Ottmar, R.D., French, N.H.F., Hoy, E.E., & Kane, E.S. (2008). Evaluation of the composite burn index for assessing fire severity in Alaskan black spruce forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 17, 515-526. doi: 10.1071/WF08002.
[27] Chuvieco, E., De Santis, A., Riaño, D., Halligan, K. (2007). Simulation approaches for burn severity estimation using remotely sensed images. Fire Ecology, 3(1), 129-150. doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0301129.
[28] De Santis, A., Chuvieco, E., & Vaughan, P.J. (2009). Short-term assessment of burn severity using the inversion of Prospect and GeoSail models. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.008.
[29] Picotte, J.J., Cansler, C.A., Kolden, C.A., Lutz, J.A., Key, C., Benson, N.C., & Robertson, K.M. (2021). Determination of burn severity models ranging from regional to national scales for the conterminous United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 263, article number 112569. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112569.
[30] Strategy for the development of Luhansk region until 2020. (2017). Retrieved from http://loga.gov.ua/sites/default/ files/collections/strategy_ukr_20-07-2017.pdf.
[31] Krakovska, S.V. (2012). Modern climate change of Luhansk region. Geoinformatics, 3(43), 57-68.
[32] Krakovska, S., Balabukh, V., Chyhareva, A., Pysarenko, L., Trofimova, I., & Shpytal, T. (2021). Projections of regional climate change in Ukraine based on multi-model ensembles of Euro-CORDEX. Retrieved from https://meetingorganizer. copernicus.org/EGU21/EGU21-13821.html.
[33] NASA Worldview. National Aeronautics and Space Administration open source software agreement, Version 1.3. (2022). Retrieved from https://worldview.earthdata.nasa.gov/.
[34] Planet team. (n.d.). Planet application program interface: In space for life on Earth. Retrieved from https://api.planet.com.
[35] Giglio, L., & Justice, C. (2003). The moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS). Retrieved from https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mod14v061/.
[36] Schroeder, W., & Giglio, L. (2018). The daily Suomi national polar-orbiting partnership (Suomi NPP) NASA visible infrared imaging radiometer suite (VIIRS) thermal anomalies/fire (VNP14A1). Retrieved from https://lpdaac.usgs. gov/products/vnp14a1v001/.
[37] Pogrebnyak, P.S. (1955). Fundamentals of forest typology. Kyiv: Academy of Sciences.
[38] Myroniuk, V., Bilous, A., Khan, Y., Terentiev, A., Kravets, P., Kovalevskyi, S., & See, L. (2020). Tracking rates of forest disturbance and associated carbon loss in areas of illegal amber mining in Ukraine using landsat time series. Remote Sensing, 12(14), article number 2235. doi: 10.3390/rs12142235.
[39] See, Z.S., & Cheok, A.D. (2015). Virtual reality 360 interactive panorama reproduction obstacles and issues. Virtual Reality, 19(2), 71-81. doi: 10.1007/s10055-014-0258-9.
[40] Fernandes, P.M., Vega, J.A., Jiménez, E., & Rigolot, E. (2008). Fire resistance of European pines. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(3), 246-255. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.032.
[41] Assessing of forest fire severity in Luhansk region after fires 2020. (2021). Retrieved from https://nubip.edu.ua/en/ node/108418.
[42] Miller, J.D., & Thode, A.E. (2007). Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR). Remote Sensing of Environment, 109(1), 66-80. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.12.006.