Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science

Forest ecosystems in the context of a green economy: Potential for sustainable energy

Nazgul Matikeeva, Alla Kozlenko, Siuta Karybekova, Azhar Tokoeva, Ainura Kamalova
Download article
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the potential for using wood biomass, including wood waste, as a renewable energy source for the energy sector of Kyrgyzstan, as well as to analyse its energy efficiency and environmental aspects. The study was conducted in two natural zones of the Kyrgyz Republic: mountainous (Naryn region) and lowland (Talas region). Field studies, laboratory methods, and statistical data processing were employed. The volume of wood in the study areas was determined by measuring the diameter and height of trees, with subsequent calculations using established formulas. The calorific value of wood from various species was analysed using the calorimetric method, and industry research data were used to estimate CO₂ emissions from the combustion of wood waste, coal, and natural gas. Statistical analysis, including the Student’s t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA), was performed to compare the energy potential of different fuel types. The results of the study indicated that Scots pine and English oak are the most promising types of wood for biofuel production in these regions. Calculations confirmed that chips and sawdust have the highest energy values, while wood bark has the lowest calorific value. Analysis of CO₂ emissions demonstrated that wood waste is a more environmentally friendly fuel compared to coal, although it is inferior to natural gas. The data obtained confirm the importance of the rational use of forest resources and the integration of wood waste into bioenergy as a means to reduce dependence on non-renewable energy sources and lower carbon dioxide emissions. The study revealed that the most promising types of wood for biofuel are Scots pine and English oak. The calorific value of chips was 9.5-10.8 GJ, sawdust – 10.2-11.5 GJ, while bark demonstrated the lowest values (8.3-9 GJ). CO₂ emissions from burning oak sawdust were 80 kg/GJ, wood chips – 90 kg/GJ, bark – 98 kg/GJ, while for pine these figures were higher: 85, 95, and 105 kg/GJ respectively. The analysis confirmed that wood waste is cleaner than coal but remains inferior to natural gas, which underlines its significance for bioenergy

Keywords

wood biomass, bioenergy, wood waste, CO₂, energy potential, renewable energy sources, sustainable development

Suggested citation
Matikeeva, N., Kozlenko, A., Karybekova, S., Tokoeva, A., & Kamalova, A. (2025). Forest ecosystems in the context of a green economy: Potential for sustainable energy. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 16(2), 42-62. https://doi.org/10.31548/forest/2.2025.42
References
  1. Adamowicz, M. (2022). Green deal, green growth and green economy as a means of support for attaining the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 14(10), article number 5901. doi: 10.3390/su14105901.
  2. Aliaño-González, M.J., Gabaston, J., Ortiz-Somovilla, V., & Cantos-Villar, E. (2022). Wood waste from fruit trees: biomolecules and their applications in agri-food industry. Biomolecules, 12(2), article number 238. doi: 10.3390/biom12020238.
  3. Besserer, A., Troilo, S., Girods, P., Rogaume, Y., & Brosse, N. (2021). Cascading recycling of wood waste: A review. Polymers, 13(11), article number 1752. doi: 10.3390/polym13111752.
  4. Bogmans, K., & Li, C.M. (2020). A greener future starts with a shift from coal to alternative energy sources. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/ru/Blogs/Articles/2020/12/08/blog-a-greener-future-begins-with-a-shift-to-coal-alternatives.
  5. Brych, V., Borysiak, O., Halysh, N., Liakhovych, G., Kupchak, V., & Vakun, O. (2023). Impact of international climate policy on the supply management of enterprises producing green energy. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 485, 649-661. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08093-7_43.
  6. Chemical composition and physical properties of gas. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://energetika.in.ua/ru/books/book-1/part-2/section-8/8-2/8-2-3.
  7. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/observances/biological-diversity-day/convention.
  8. Da Silva, L.T., da S., Braz, R.L., Silva, T.C., Reis, C.A., da Silva, D.A., & Aleixo da Silva, J.A. (2021). Energetic potential of Eucalyptus sp. wood cultivated in the Plaster’s Pole of Araripe, PE, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16(1), article number a8961. doi: 10.5039/agraria.v16i1a8961.
  9. Dzhumabaev, K., Abyshov, I., & Dzhumabaev, A.K. (2023). Questions about the transition to a green economy in Kyrgyzstan. Science, New Technologies and Innovations in Kyrgyzstan, 8, 101-105. doi: 10.26104/NNTIK.2023.95.12.019.
  10. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2019). Concept of Forest Industry Development in the Kyrgyz Republic until 2040. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/e5194c02-7725-485a-8709-04d9c39a0d95/content.
  11. Forest cover of Naryn oblast. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/biom/lib/article/situation_with_forests_kr.pdf.
  12. Forest Measurement and Modelling. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://fennerschool-associated.anu.edu.au/mensuration/shape.htm.
  13. Golub, G., Kukharets, S., Tsyvenkova, N., Yarosh, Y., & Chuba, V. (2018). Experimental study into the influence of straw content in fuel on parameters of generator gas. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(8-95), 76-86. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2018.142159.
  14. Green energy and biofuels: Who in the world has successfully caught the bioenergy wave. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://n-e-c.com.ua/uk/node/331.
  15. Kalivoshko, О., Naumovska, O., Berezhniak, Y., Palamarchuk, S., & Pavliuk, S. (2024). Ecological and economic justification of the efficiency of carbon sorbents based on sawwood of different trees. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 15(2), 28-40. doi: 10.31548/biologiya15(2).2024.003.
  16. Khan, N., Sudhakar, K., & Mamat, R. (2021). Role of biofuels in energy transition, green economy, and carbon neutrality. Sustainability, 13(22), article number 12374. doi: 10.3390/su132212374.
  17. Khlivitskyi, R.G. (2023). Volumes of harvest, use and prospective reserves of fuel wood in branch “Chuhuyevo-Babchans’ke Forestry” of State Enterprise “Forests of Ukraine”. Kharkiv: State Biotechnological University.
  18. Kiehbadroudinezhad, M., Merabet, A., Ghenaim, C., Abo-Khalil, A.G., & Salameh, T. (2023). The role of biofuels for sustainable Microgrids: A path towards carbon neutrality and the green economy. Heliyon, 9(2), article number e13407. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13407.
  19. Kirchsteiger, B., Kubik, F., Sturmlechner, R., Stressler, H., Schwabl, M., Kistler, M., & Kasper-Giebl, A. (2021). Real-life emissions from residential wood combustion in Austria: From TSP emissions to PAH emission profiles, diagnostic ratios and toxic risk assessment. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 12(8), article number 101127. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101127.
  20. Lazaridou, D.C., Michailidis, A., & Trigkas, M. (2021). Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a forest-based circular economy: A literature review. Forests, 12(4), article number 436. doi: 10.3390/f12040436.
  21. Lyubchyk, A., Lygina, O., Lyubchyk, S., Fonseca, I., Tulepov, M., Mansurov, Z., & Lyubchik, S. (2015). Activated carbons from co-mingled liquid and solid organic wastes. Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal, 17, 47-65. doi: 10.18321/ectj339.
  22. Lyubchyk, S., Shapovalova, O., Lygina, O., Oliveira, M.C., Appazov, N., Lyubchyk, A., Charmier, A.J., Lyubchik, S., & Pombeiro, A.J.L. (2019). Integrated green chemical approach to the medicinal plant carpobrotus edulis processing. Scientific Reports, 9(1), article number 18171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53817-8.
  23. Myllyviita, T., Soimakallio, S., Judl, J., & Seppälä, J. (2021). Wood substitution potential in greenhouse gas emission reduction – review on current state and application of displacement factors. Forest Ecosystems, 8, article number 42. doi: 10.1186/s40663-021-00326-8.
  24. National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. (n.d.). Environment. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.kg/ru/opendata/category/10/.
  25. National Strategy for Sustainable Development of the Kyrgyz Republic for the period 2013-2017. (2011). Retrieved from https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/kyr143374R.pdf.
  26. Natural coal from Ukraine and the alternative – Grades, calorific value and how to heat properly. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://prombriket.in.ua/ugol/prirodnyj-ugol-ukrainy.
  27. Olszewski, A., Kosmela, P., & Piszczyk, Ł. (2023). A novel approach in wood waste utilization for manufacturing of catalyst-free polyurethane-wood composites (PU-WC). Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 36, article number e00619. doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00619.
  28. Pandey, S. (2022). Wood waste utilization and associated product development from under-utilized low-quality wood and its prospects in Nepal. SN Applied Sciences, 4, article number 168. doi: 10.1007/s42452-022-05061-5.
  29. Paunu, V.-V., et al. (2021). Spatial distribution of residential wood combustion emissions in the Nordic countries: How well national inventories represent local emissions? Atmospheric Environment, 264, article number 118712. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118712.
  30. Properties of coals as an object of beneficiation. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://energetika.in.ua/ru/books/book-1/part-2/section-7/7-2/7-2-2.
  31. Proto, A.R., Palma, A., Paris, E., Papandrea, S.F., Vincenti, B., Carnevale, M., Guerriero, E., Bonofiglio, R., & Gallucci, F. (2021). Assessment of wood chip combustion and emission behavior of different agricultural biomasses. Fuel, 289, article number 119758. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119758.
  32. Raihan, A., & Tuspekova, A. (2022). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between economic growth, renewable energy use, forested area, and carbon emissions in Malaysia. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 15, article number 200096. doi: 10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200096.
  33. Sabishchenko, O. (2022). Regional and technical and economic features of electricity generation by renewable energy sources. Economy and Society, 43. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2022-43-75.
  34. Sakbaeva, Z., & Karabaev, N. (2022). Prospects for the protection of components of the biosphere of the nut-fruit forests of the Kyrgyz Republic in the era of the green economy. Science, New Technologies and Innovations in Kyrgyzstan, 1, 57-62. doi: 10.26104/NNTIK.2019.45.557.
  35. Shah, S.M., Jiang, Y., Wu, H., Ahmed, Z., Ullah, I., & Adebayo, T.S. (2021). Linking green human resource practices and environmental economics performance: The role of green economic organizational culture and green psychological climate. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), article number 10953. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010953.
  36. Shao, J., Liu, Z., Ma, G., Zhang, Q., & Wang, J. (2024). Green growth and urban employment: Evaluating the impact of ecosystem conservation on diverse sectors in Yunnan Province, China. Sustainable Development, 33(1), 1030-1043. doi: 10.1002/sd.3168.
  37. Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Clark, J.H., Graham, N.J., Hou, D., Ok, Y.S., & Tsang, D.C. (2022). Tailoring wood waste biochar as a reusable microwave absorbent for pollutant removal: Structure-property-performance relationship and iron-carbon interaction. Bioresource Technology, 362, article number 127838. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127838.
  38. Thees, O., Erni, M., & Burg, V. (2023). Wood fuel in Switzerland: Energy potential, technology development, resource mobilization, and its role in the energy transition. White paper. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research WSL. doi: 10.55419/wsl:32791.
  39. Timonen, H., et al. (2021). Household solid waste combustion with wood increases particulate trace metal and lung deposited surface area emissions. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, article number 112793. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112793.
  40. United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Pilot methodology for calculating carbon dioxide emissions, developed taking into account the national conditions of Uzbekistan and its peculiarities. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2022-08/Pilot%20methology%20to%20estimate%20carbon%20footpint%20of%20company_ru%20%281%29.pdf.
  41. Vasylyshyn, R., Lakyda, М., Bidolakh, D., & Lakyda, І. (2023). Carbon sequestrative capacity of scots pine stands in urban forests of Kyiv city. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 19(2), 1-10. doi: 10.31548/dopovidi2(102).2023.016.
  42. Yerniyazova, Zh., Asrepov, G., Aiguzhinova, D., Nurbayeva, G., & Zhanuzakova, S. (2024). Economic aspects of implementing environmentally friendly energy sources in the agro-industrial complex (focusing on European countries). Scientific Horizons, 27(11), 153-165. doi: 10.48077/scihor11.2024.153.
  43. Yusupova, G., Namatbekova, N., & Choguldurova, E. (2023). Green economy based on water and energy resources of Kyrgyzstan. Proceedings of the Universities of Kyrgyzstan, 6, 188-192. doi: 10.26104/IVK.2023.45.557.
  44. Zhang, L., Xu, M., Chen, H., Li, Y., & Chen, S. (2022). Globalization, green economy and environmental challenges: State of the art review for practical implications. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, article number 870271. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.870271.