Common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) is an important part of the forest, shelterwood and ornamental stands. The health status of F. excelsior has recently deteriorated in many regions, due to climate change, anthropogenic stress, diseases and phytophagous insects. The effects of these factors are manifested in symptoms, the prevalence and severity of which depend on local conditions, in particular forest site conditions, stand composition, and structure. The aim of the research was to identify the forest site conditions and other stand characteristics most favourable for the prevalence and severity of symptoms of ash decline in Zhytomyr Polissya. The tasks were: to evaluate the common ash health condition, the symptoms of its decline, and their prevalence and severity in relation to forest category, forest site conditions, main forest forming tree species, ash origin, age, and relative stocking density. The majority of the ash stands surveyed were found to be weak. The health condition of F. excelsior deteriorates with age. It is worse in forest belts, in damp relatively fertile forest site conditions (С4), in the stands of vegetative origin, with a lower relative stocking density, and in the stands with Alnus glutinosa as the main forest forming species. Dry branches, epicormic shoots, collar rot, and ash bark beetles were the most common symptoms of ash weakness. The prevalence and severity of most of these symptoms were the highest in the forest shelter belts, in the damp relatively fertile forest site conditions (С4), in the stands of vegetative origin, with a lower relative density of stocking and older than 60 years. It is necessary to monitor the health status of F. excelsior in order to detect pathological processes and to select trees for selective sanitary felling in time. The severity of collar rot increased at the relative stocking density of 0.8. It is proposed to grow F. excelsior in mixed stands mainly with Quercus robur and to give preference to seed origin. It is necessary to monitor the health status of F. excelsior in order to detect pathological processes and to select trees for selective sanitary felling in time
tree health condition, dry branches, epicormic shoots, collar rot, bark beetles; prevalence (of symptoms), severity (of symptoms)
[1] Baxter, E., Cooke, L.R., Spaans, F., Grant, I.R., & McCracken, A.R. (2023). The introduction of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus to Northern Ireland and the subsequent development of ash dieback. Forest Pathology, 53(1), article number e12789.
[2] Benigno, A., Bregant, C., Aglietti, C., Rossetto, G., Tolio, B., Moricca, S., & Linaldeddu, B.T. (2023). Pathogenic fungi and oomycetes causing dieback on Fraxinus species in the Mediterranean climate change hotspot region. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6, article number 1253022. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1253022.
[3] Borysova, V.L. (2021). Health condition of common ash in the Left-bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine. (PhD thesis, Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration named after G. M. Vysotsky, Kharkiv, Ukraine).
[4] Buzun, V.O., Turko, V.M., & Siruk, Yu.V. (2018). Book of forests of Zhytomyr region: Historical and economic essay. Zhytomyr: O.O. Evenok.
[5] Cântar, I.C., Ciontu, C.I., Dincă, L., Borlea, G.F., & Crişan, V.E. (2022). Damage and tolerability thresholds for remaining trees after timber harvesting: A case study from southwest Romania. Diversity, 14(3), article number 193. doi: 10.3390/d14030193.
[6] Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text.
[7] Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. (1973, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_129#Text.
[8] Gašparović, M., Pilaš, I., Klobučar, D., & Gašparović, I. (2023). Monitoring ash dieback in Europe – an unrevealed perspective for remote sensing? Remote Sensing, 15(5), article number 1178. doi: 10.3390/rs15051178.
[9] Goychuk, A., Kulbanska, I., Shvets, M., Pasichnyk, L., Patyka, V., Kalinichenko, A., & Degtyareva, L. (2023). Bacterial diseases of bioenergy woody plants in Ukraine. Sustainability, 15(5), article number 4189. doi: 10.3390/su15054189.
[10] Goychuk, A., Kulbanska, I., Vyshnevskyi, A., Shvets, M., & Andreieva, O. (2022). Spread and harmfulness of infectious diseases of the main forest-forming species in Zhytomyr Polissia of Ukraine. Scientific Horizons, 25(9), 64-74. doi: 10.48077/scihor.25(9).2022.64-74.
[11] Guidelines for survey, assessment, and forecasting the spread of forest pests and diseases for the plains of Ukraine. (2020). Kharkiv: Planeta-print.
[12] Hammer, O., Harper, D.A.T., & Ryan, P.D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, article number 4.
[13] Horáková, M.K., Barta, M., Adamčíková, K., Ostrovský, R., & Pastirčáková, K. (2023). Hymenoscyphus fraxineus on Fraxinus excelsior in Slovakia: Distribution and mating types. Biologia, 78(5), 1219-1230. doi: 10.1007/s11756-022-01023-9.
[14] Kuznetsova, O.A., Turenko, V.P., Tovstukha, O.V., & Davydenko, K.V. (2023). Pest and disease incidence of Ulmus sp. in forest shelter belts along the Kyiv-Kharkiv highway. Forestry & Forest Melioration, 143, 102-111. doi: 10.33220/1026-3365.143.2023.102.
[15] La Porta, N., Hietala, A.M., & Baldi, P. (2022). Bacterial diseases in forest trees. In Forest microbiology (Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 139-166). Cambridge: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-18694-3.00001-8.
[16] Langer, G.J., Fuchs, S., Osewold, J., Peters, S., Schrewe, F., Ridley, M., Kätzel, R., Bubner, B., & Grüner, J. (2022). FraxForFuture – research on European ash dieback in Germany. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 129, 1285-1295. doi: 10.1007/s41348-022-00670-z.
[17] Laz, B. (2024). Observations on Zeuzera pyrina L. (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) damage on Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl in urban landscape of Kahramanmaras. Turkish Journal of Forest Science, 8(1), 53-62.
[18] Lysenko, L., Griem, E., Wagener, P., & Langer, E.J. (2024). Fungi associated with fine roots of Fraxinus excelsior affected by ash dieback detected by next-generation sequencing. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. doi: 10.1007/s41348-024-00923-z.
[19] Maes, J., Bruzón, A.G., Barredo, J.I., Vallecillo, S., Vogt, P., Rivero, I.M., & Santos-Martín, F. (2023). Accounting for forest condition in Europe based on an international statistical standard. Nature Communications, 14(1), article number 3723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39434-0.
[20] Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. (2010). Hamburg: UNECE.
[21] Meger, J., Ulaszewski, B., Pałucka, M., Kozioł, C., & Burczyk, J. (2024). Genomic prediction of resistance to Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) populations. Evolutionary Applications, 17(5), article number e13694. doi: 10.1111/eva.13694.
[22] Meshkova, V., Samoday, V., & Davydenko, K. (2021). Ash dieback and contributing factors of forest weakening in provenance tests in the Sumy region. Central European Forestry Journal, 67, 113-121. doi: 10.2478/forj-2021-0001.
[23] Peck, R., Short, T., & Olsen, C. (2020). Introduction to statistics and data analysis. Boston: Cengage Learning.
[24] Peters, S., et al. (2024). The fungal predominance in stem collar necroses of Fraxinus excelsior: A study on Hymenoscyphus fraxineus multilocus genotypes. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. doi: 10.1007/s41348-024-00912-2.
[25] Peters, S., Fuchs, S., Bien, S., Bußkamp, J., Langer, G.J., & Langer, E.J. (2023). Fungi associated with stem collar necroses of Fraxinus excelsior affected by ash dieback. Mycological Progress, 22(7), article number 52. doi: 10.1007/s11557-023-01897-2.
[26] Pyvovar, T., Lialin, O., & Meshkova, V. (2022). Causes and trends in defoliation of Fraxinus excelsior L. in Ukraine according to forest monitoring data. Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 24, 36-46. doi: 10.15421/412203.
[27] Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 756 “Sanitary Forests Regulations in Ukraine”. (2016, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/756-2016-%D0%BF#n11.
[28] Rozsypálek, J., Martinek, P., Palovčíková, D., & Jankovský, L. (2023). The protection of ash trees against ash dieback by tree injections. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 88, article number 128071. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128071.
[29] Stanley, R.K., et al. (2023). Emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) infestation bioassays and metabolic profiles of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) provide evidence for an induced host defensive response to larval infestation. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6, article number 1166421. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1166421.
[30] State Service of Ukraine on Food Safety and Consumer Protection. (n.d.). Phytosanitary monitoring. Retrieved from https://dpss.gov.ua/fitosanitariya-kontrol-u-sferi-nasinnictva-ta-rozsadnictva/fitosanitarnij-kontrol/fitosanitarnij-monitoring.
[31] Sun, J., Koski, T.M., Wickham, J.D., Baranchikov, Y.N., & Bushley, K.E. (2024). Emerald ash borer management and research: decades of damage and still expanding. Annual Review of Entomology, 69(1), 239-258. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-012323-032231.
[32] Sydorenko, S.V., Zinchenko, O.V., Skrylnyk, Yu.Ye., Kukina, O.M., & Sydorenko, S.H. (2020). Entomocomplex and health condition of forest shelterbelts of the State Enterprise “Elitne Research Farm of Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuryev of NAAS”. Forestry&Forest Melioration, 136, 184-193. doi: 10.33220/1026-3365.136.2020.184.
[33] Ukrainian State Forest Management Planning Association. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://lisproekt.gov.ua/.
[34] Vasaitis, R. (2024). Alien invasive pathogens and pests in the changing environment: Focus on North Europe. Baltic Forestry, 30(1), article number id750. doi: 10.46490/BF750.